Essential training escoliosis dextroconvexa

A successful science career may depend more on our interactions with others than it does on the quality of our science. Unfortunately, good science is all too often impeded by breakdowns que es escoliosis dorsal in communication. When this happens, our emotions and reason can both sabotage our ability to find a successful resolution. This workshop will review several strategies to increase the chance that a crucial conversation will be a successful conversation.

The integrity of research fundamentally depends on data. The purpose of this workshop will be to consider the many ways in which that integrity can be compromised without intending to do so. Participants will review some of those challenges, as well as consider hernia de disco lumbar strategies to protect against error due to inadequate attention or bias.

Science is inevitably a collaborative enterprise. As investigators tackle larger and more complex problems, research teams have grown increasingly inter-disciplinary, involving experts with varying backgrounds and sometimes-competing expectations. Collaborations involving multiple labs and/or institutions in different countries exacerbate the challenges of effective cooperation. Even collaborators within a given lab often confront thorny issues when it comes to assigning fair estenosis lumbar tratamiento credit and authorship. This workshop aims to engage participants in identifying and analyzing problems in scientific collaboration. The ultimate end involves developing effective strategies for managing (or avoiding!) conflicts. This preparacion para radiografia de columna lumbosacra is an interactive workshop using case studies and participant experiences.

Statistics are an important tool for much of research, allowing researchers to better summarize findings and to provide inferences about the likelihood of particular outcomes. However, statistical procedures are diverse and may well be beyond the expertise of some scientists. This workshop is not dolor lumbar lado izquierdo designed to teach about any particular test procedures, but instead to focus on general principles, the challenges that come with an incomplete understanding of those principles, and the risks of statistical misuse. This workshop is designed as an interactive lecture with small or large group discussion.

Recently, it has become disturbingly clear that much of published science may not be reproducible. The problem is not so much one of research misconduct, but rather departures from good practices of science. This contractura lumbar izquierda workshop will first consider the scope of the problem: How often is research not reproducible? Does it depend on field? What are the personal experiences of the participants in the workshop? Then, we will turn to practical questions of why research is often not reproducible and what should be done about this challenge. Our discussion will touch on topics such as authorship, collaboration, data management, mentoring, peer review, and social responsibility.

Effective communication of science often depends on having convincing pictures. While a story can frequently be told better with a picture than words, it isn’t always easy to produce a definitive image. Our goal to effectively communicate a story is also challenged cirugia lumbar because we don’t want to communicate something that isn’t in fact representative of the truth. With tools like Photoshop at our disposal, we have the ability to "clean up" a messy image, but is it OK to do so? It seems reasonable to expect that some kinds of manipulation of a picture should be OK, but how much is too much? This workshop will focus on the personal experiences dolor lumbar tratamiento of the participants, review some cases of published digital manipulation, and consider some standards that might be adopted as good practices in science.